[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/* |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:22:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
Hi,
I tested the patch on my scores now (SATB choirs) and it works
perfectly. I applied the 0001-Automated-lyric-extenders.patch and it
adds the extenders where I had put them by hand before and a few other
reasonable places. Before, I made a per-syllable-decision whether I put
it or not. Now, a given minimum-length is much more consistent troughout
the piece. 1.5 is a reasonable default value in my scores.
Explicit __ extenders are printed no matter if it is too short or not.
Is that expected? (It makes sense but looks ugly :) But ok, if the users
insists.)
So, I could not find any drawbacks. It works. The questions about how
many properties are needed and how they are called, are going into a
good direction, I think.
Thanks for your work, Alexander and Knut et al.!
Cheers,
Joram
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, (continued)
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Paul, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/18
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/18
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Noeck, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Trevor Daniels, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/17
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/17
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*,
Noeck <=
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Urs Liska, 2016/12/14
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, David Nalesnik, 2016/12/14