Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al.

[Thomas Morley]

2017-06-07 21:53 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:

>
> Is there any place else in the codebase where we include lilypond examples
> in the doc strings?  It seems like we ought to try for consistency; either
> use lilypond examples in all of the doc strings (maybe at least for markup
> functions) or in none of them.  I don't know the right answer; I'm just
> raising the question.

>From the comment on top of define-markup-commands.scm:
[...]
;;;
;;; Each markup command definition shall have a documentation string
;;; with description, syntax and example.

Cheers,
  Harm