Re: question about accidentals

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> > >
> > > It really wouldn't be that difficult to make a setting to
> >
> > it depends. It would be quite hairy to get transposition right, for
> > example.
> 
> Not if the operation of making the signature chromatics is done *first*.
> [..snippage..]
>
> I'm sure I could implement this to use with sly, but sly is really
> for large projects, and MakeKeySignatureChromatics would probably
> be of even more use to someone doing something small in a hurry.

I suppose that it would have to be added to sly, because I'm not
adding it to LilyPond: I think it is a bad idea.

Discussion closed.

> > > Is there some reason "x" can't be used optionally instead of
> > > "ss"?  It wouldn't be necessary to get rid of "ss" to do it.
> > > daveA
> >
> > ss?
> >
> > You mean sharpsharp for the US-notenames?
> 
> Sure.  I have never seen a double sharp referred to as a sharpsharp.  
> Is "gx" much worse than "gisis", if you could use both
> indiscriminately

added to  1.9 CVS.


-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen