lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: missing lilypond-tex-metrics.tex


From: Aaron Mehl
Subject: Re: missing lilypond-tex-metrics.tex
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 19:53:52 -0700 (PDT)

> I think we use "should be" and "must" fairly
> interchangeably.
  As a techwriter/user this confuses me. should be is
a much weaker expression, like it doesn't have to but
if you want.. must says that it is a requirement to
have on of these.

> > then it says:
> > "A .ly file contains any number of toplevel
> > expressions, where a toplevel expression is one of
> the
> > following"
> >
> > well this is vague. because if some top level
> elements
> > are left out the file won't parse while if others
> are
> > left out it will.
> 
> Well... but only _requirement_ is that there's some
> music in

You mean to say that if I write a lilypond file
with a header and a'4 it will parse? I am trying here
to clarify what the intent of the documentation is
here, not be picky per se.

A user doesn't want to know what he may or should do,
but what he needs to get this up and running. What I
mean is beating around the bush doesn't help. If this
is a page detailing lilypond file structure it should
do that specifically not with shoulds and mights. If
there are different possiblilies they need to be laid
out.
I in fact recall that for structure there was never a
one stop shop (on page) that in a straight forward
manner detailed what is the structure (in detail) of a
lilypond  file. I infact thought for years that the
[that = this] format of almost all lilypond files I
saw on the mailing list and the site was a requirement
of Lilypond, as opposed to a feature.
> the file.  And even then I'm not certain that
> lilypond will give
> a parse error.
> 
> If a file won't parse, then something else is wrong.

> > the example given doesn't use a \score {} block,
> so I
> > must assume that lilypond no longer requires a
> score
> > block?
> 
> Correct.
> 
> > I see a layout block has this replaced the
> \paper{} ?
> 
> Kind-of.  See the "Paper output" section in "Output
> formats".
> 
> > I am in the mean time still trying to make a
> layout
> > with no includes and lyrics.
> 
> In addition to reading the manual, you might want to
> look at
> some examples from Mutopia or LSR.
> 
> - Graham
> 
> 


                
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch.html




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]