lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26


From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: RE: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:10:23 -0000

Graham, you wrote:
>
> Final call for comments on NR 1.1 Pitches.

In general all is very clear.  I spotted only a couple of
things to comment on:

1.1.1:

Head:
convient -> convenient

Relative octave entry:
There is a much simpler way of describing how this works.
It's in 2.1.2 of the LM: a note is placed in the octave
which is within three staff spaces of the previous note,
ignoring all accidentals.  Simply count staff spaces between
the positions of the two noteheads.  All the talk of
doubly-augmented fourths and double-diminished fifths is
just confusing and unnecessary.

1.1.3:

Clef:
In the list of clefs the brackets round the pitch is better
omitted.  For example, the treble clef places the pitch g'
on the 2nd line.  This is clearer if written as "G clef, g'
is on 2nd line"

Trevor D






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]