[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!]
|
From: |
Francisco Vila |
|
Subject: |
Re: mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!] |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:55:14 +0200 |
2009/9/7 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> However, I don't particularly want my photo on the lilypond
> website. This opens the possibility of having photos of some
> developers but not others, which might seem a big ragged or
> unbalanced.
A possibility would be
Developer One
Developer Two
Developer Three [small link to photo]
Developer Four [small link to photo]
Developer Five
No one has a photo showed directly (looks balanced) but there are
links to photos for some developers who don't mind to have one.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
www.csmbadajoz.com
- Re: The LilyPond Report, again!, (continued)
mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/09/07
- Re: mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!], Valentin Villenave, 2009/09/07
- Re: mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!], Graham Percival, 2009/09/07
- Re: mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!],
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/09/07
- Re: mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!], Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/09/07
- Re: mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!], Peter Chubb, 2009/09/07
- Re: mugshots for web page? [WAS: The LilyPond Report, again!], Graham Percival, 2009/09/11
Re: The LilyPond Report, again!, Jonathan Wilkes, 2009/09/06