[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch (SOLVED)
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch (SOLVED) |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:08:23 -0700 |
On 11/20/09 8:58 PM, "Jesús Guillermo Andrade" <address@hidden>
wrote:
> Got the prick little b... It was as Carl initially suggested. I made a minimal
> example and found that there was a problem with the model for the string
> tuning function.
> Thanks a lot...
There was also a bug in the code that you found for me. It's been fixed in
git.
You don't need to get the latest, as the warning is harmless. But your code
would not generate the warning even with the wrong octave in the latest
version of LilyPond.
Thanks,
Carl
- No string for pitch #<Pitch, Jesús Guillermo Andrade, 2009/11/17
- Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch, David Kastrup, 2009/11/18
- Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch, Trevor Daniels, 2009/11/18
- Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch, Jesús Guillermo Andrade, 2009/11/19
- Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch, Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/19
- Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch, Jesús Guillermo Andrade, 2009/11/19
- Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch, -Eluze, 2009/11/20
- Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch, Jesús Guillermo Andrade, 2009/11/20
- Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch (SOLVED), Jesús Guillermo Andrade, 2009/11/20
- Re: No string for pitch #<Pitch (SOLVED),
Carl Sorensen <=