[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:15:59 +0100 |
Hi Phil,
2012/2/19 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
> It looks like what you've done is exactly right for preparing for updating
> the LSR. I think you have 2 options: 1) wait until we know that the LSR
> will be moved to 2.14 before doing anything else; or 2) "correct" the syntax
> of the files you know have errors ready for that move. Which you do is up
> to you - bear in mind that if you go for 2), then it's possible that the
> work will be wasted if we struggle to get the LSR updated. However, you
> will at least be prepared.
I started with 2)
>
> A few other comments to let you understand the LSR as well as I do - which
> isn't huge.
>
> It's used for 2 things, really - the online searchable index, and also to
> create snippets that can be put in the documents. These are tagged with
> "docs" in the LSR and are then included in the documentation package by
> copying them over and running makeLSR on them. That's where the snippets in
> the URL you showed from Savannah come from - they're a subset of the full
> LSR. When one of the "docs" snippets is known not to work on the latest
> development version, a working version is created in snippets/new, and this
> is used in the build system in preference to the original. This is
> therefore a further indication of which snippets won't work, although only
> of the ones tagged 'docs'
Thanks for clarification.
More questions. :)
In the LSR-download I found several sub-directories like:
"all"
"ancient-notation"
"automatic-notation"
etc
I only worked on the files from "all". Correct? Or should I have a
look in the other directories?
Once the files are fixed completely, what to do with them?
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/27
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=