lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:04:18 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux)

Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi David,
>
> 2012/2/19 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
>> Hi Harm,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  2) "correct" the syntax of the files you know have errors ready for that
>>> move.  Which you do is up to you -  bear in mind that if you go for 2), then
>>> it's possible that the work will be wasted if we struggle to get the LSR
>>> updated.  However, you will at least be prepared.
>>>
>>
>> If you'd like to go the route of updating syntax in the problem files to
>> 2.14, then I'll be happy to take on part of the task.  Just let me know!
>>
>> -David
>
> I fixed already following files:
>
> Altering-the-number-of-stems-in-a-beam.ly
>  I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting.
>
> automatic-beams-two-per-two-in-4-4-or-2-2-time-signature.ly
>  I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting.
>
> coloring-individual-staff-lines.ly
>  I added the definition for interval-translate from 2.12.3
>  Better use an other fix?

[...]

Did you try using convert-ly?  If it works, the fix is likely somewhat
related to the "right" behavior according to whoever wrote the
convertrules.

-- 
David Kastrup




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]