[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lyrics to music
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: lyrics to music |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:18:43 -0500 |
Hi Father Michael,
> the musician who puts some music together for us monks uses beams across
> syllables and words ...
Exactly — this is one of the main reasons the standard is now to beam according
to beat. There are too many situations where the lyrics in different verses of
the same music have different syllabic structure. In the old engraving
practice, each verse would potentially need a completely different beaming
pattern, each of which would require more engraving space (or more confusing
overlays) and demand that the [sight-]reader parse different patterns which
ultimately describe the same metrical pattern of notes.
> That's definitely pushing my limits for ease of reading when the piece is
> unfamiliar!
Yes.
Do yourself (and all other musicians) a favour: Always beam lyrics to the beat,
not the melismas. There are several other notational elements (extenders,
slurs, etc.) which should be used to highlight melismas, which will not obscure
the underlying metrical pattern of notes.
All the best,
Kieren.
- lyrics to music, Fr. Michael Gilmary, mma, 2012/11/20
- Re: lyrics to music, James Bailey, 2012/11/20
- Re: lyrics to music, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/11/20
- Re: lyrics to music, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/11/20
- Re: lyrics to music, Phil Holmes, 2012/11/20
- Re: lyrics to music, Fr. Michael Gilmary, mma, 2012/11/20
- Re: lyrics to music, Stjepan Horvat, 2012/11/21
- Re: lyrics to music,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: lyrics to music, Fr. Michael Gilmary, mma, 2012/11/21
- Re: lyrics to music, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/11/21
- Re: lyrics to music, Fr. Michael Gilmary, mma, 2012/11/21
Re: lyrics to music, Eby Mani, 2012/11/21