[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:06:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>> Because when I started coding for the project, there was not a
>> single use of MAKE_DOCUMENTED_SCHEME_CALLBACK whereas there are
>> currently 276 uses of MAKE_SCHEME_CALLBACK.
>
> Umpf. We still have *zero* use of MAKE_DOCUMENTED_SCHEME_CALLBACK, as
> far as I can see. This macro refers to
> MAKE_SCHEME_CALLBACK_WITH_OPTARGS, and there is a *single* function
> (`interpret_markup') which actually has a real documentation string;
> all others have "".
>
> Sigh.
Well, I guess step one is to rename MAKE_DOCUMENTED_SCHEME_CALLBACK to
MAKE_SCHEME_CALLBACK and adjust all callers. There is no point in
suggesting that the normal course would be an absence of documentation.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, (continued)
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13