[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score)
From: |
flup2 |
Subject: |
Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score) |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Mar 2013 23:39:11 -0800 (PST) |
Mac installation is long, but it doesn't make so much problem now.
The .app mentionned was only a test for including the dependencies in the
app, not meant to be usable in production.
But as soon as the macports installation is done (between 1 and 4 hours
depending the computer age), anyone can create an .app bundle (I posted the
way to do it) that only includes a launch script.
Anyway, Frescobaldi still has some problems (due to QT on mac, not from
Frescobaldi itself). But for me, a solution like TextWrangler + Preview (or
TeXShop, etc.) looses the main advantage of Frescobaldi (and JEdit): point
and click (point and click from Preview or TeXShop launchs the
LilyPond-included editor).
I plan to try making a macport Portfile, allowing to install Frescobaldi, a
script launcher and its dependencies using only 1 command
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frescobaldi-install-was-final-score-tp142376p142405.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Frescobaldi install (was: final score), Francisco Vila, 2013/03/09
- Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score), Tim McNamara, 2013/03/09
- Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score),
flup2 <=
- Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score), Paul Morris, 2013/03/10
- Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score), flup2, 2013/03/10
- Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score), Paul Morris, 2013/03/10
- Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score), flup2, 2013/03/10
- Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score), Paul Morris, 2013/03/10
Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score), Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/03/10
Re: Frescobaldi install (was: final score), Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2013/03/19