Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break

[Robert Schmaus]

> I play and typeset a lot of latin american music which has a lot of
> syncopation which makes this particlar scene appear quite often.
> Maybe I got used to something non-standard but it still seems more logical
> to me to omit the tied accidental and treat the measure as if there was no
> line break.

I can confirm that also from pov of jazz music - I've looked through 
some of the "official" jazz publications and haven't seen any 
accidentals on tied-and-broken notes. Perhaps Gould's rule in this case 
is mainly meant for classical notation practice?