|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Comparing LilyPond with Sibelius, Finale, Musescore etc |
Date: | Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:03:00 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
Am 20.07.2013 17:57, schrieb Richard
Shann:
What about the LilyPond and Finale renderings on that page: http://lilypond.ursliska.de/notensatz/lilypond-tutorials/tackle-complex-tasks/part-2-improving-the-output.html?I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting compared with those of well-known alternatives: http://denemo.org/CompareScorewriters If anyone can provide better examples - these are just taken from published work that I could find with a quick search - then please let me know - especially if I am not doing LilyPond justice. My examples have a common origin in MusicXML files, but there may be some other way of standardizing the comparisons (short of re-typing music examples...). Richard _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Unfortunately TYPO3 scrambled the links to the full-size images, but it already gives you an idea. I like this example because it displays a task LilyPond does _not_ manage - but then shows that Finale behaves much worse with it. (But to be honest: it's Finale 2008 and should maybe rerendered with a current version). Urs |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |