|
From: | Carl Peterson |
Subject: | Re: SMuFL |
Date: | Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:58:45 -0400 |
Am 09.08.2013 15:11, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:Of course I don't know that either, but I see a few steps:1) Modify the mapping of glyphs to Unicode numbers
I think that would be very simple, just a matter of remapping them in a suitable application.
If LilyPond really accesses the glyphs by their names this wouldn't even imply any internal changes.
2) Adapt anchors and (perhaps) scaling
If I understand the SMuFL specification correctly it also specifies where the anchors should be set in the glyphs.
I don't know what this would mean in terms of development.
Maybe it's 'just' a matter of updating the glyphs and one setting in LilyPond for each glyph.
But it could also be that one would have to re-define the glyph positioning in LilyPond at a deeper level,
with all kinds of possible side-effects ...
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |