|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: point and click (was: Project Completed(-ish)) |
Date: | Sat, 07 Sep 2013 15:19:38 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
Am 07.09.2013 13:49, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Ok, that'd be helpful indeed, but (correct me if i'm wrong) all the links in the pdf are absolute paths pointing to the original source file. Which means that: - if i move my source file, the link doesn't work - if i don't have the source file, the link doesn't do anything useful So when someone sends me a pdf without the source, all links are useless.
Would it make sense (and be non-trivial) to make the links relative? It seems this could help some use cases, although not all.If someone sends me a pdf with its LilyPond source I can simply drop them anywhere and it'll work. OTOH, if I manage my stuff through version control and pull changes from somewhere else, the links will have become outdated and point to the wrong places. And through version control you can't use file dates to compare.
Urs
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |