Re: Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note splitting

[SoundsFromSound]

Hi David,

I just tested that code with my version 2.17.24 - please see attached PNG.
Hope this helps you narrow things down.

Ben

[png]

v2.17.24_-_Note_Splitting.png
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n151743/v2.17.24_-_Note_Splitting.png>
  



David Kastrup wrote
> Gilberto Agostinho &lt;

> gilbertohasnofb@

> &gt; writes:
> 
>>
>> I think I found two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
>> splitting.
>>
>> 1) when a note has an accidental and it has to be split, the ligaturas
>> look
>> out of place.
>>
>> 2) when a note has an accidental (regular accidental, or forced
>> accidental
>> with an !, or even due to *dodecaphonic style*) and it has to be split,
>> these accidentals appear in all repeated notes.
> 
> 
>> So are these bugs or am I misusing the rhythm splitting?
> 
> Bugs.  Regressions.  In 2.16.0, everything looks fine except for the
> repeated forced accidentals (those have always been overlooked, I
> guess).
> 
> Bug squad, can you file the original report and the examples?  And can
> people who have some version of 2.17 installed narrow this in some more?
> I don't really fancy bisecting all the way from 2.16.
> 
> -- 
> David Kastrup
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list

> lilypond-user@

> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user





-----
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Two-possible-bugs-when-dealing-with-Automatic-note-splitting-tp151739p151743.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.