Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11

[Urs Liska]

Am 16.10.2013 17:42, schrieb Urs Liska:
> Am 16.10.2013 17:39, schrieb Phil Burfitt:
> > Hi Janek,
> >
> >
> > > > In my current work flow, I have a .ly file of functions in a non 
> > > > lilypond
> > > > directory, which I \include in all of my scores. Is there a way to 
> > > > define a
> > > > path for include files in Frescobaldi, or do I have to give the 
> > > > full path in
> > > > the \include statement?
> > > >
> > > > I included the path in the "Lilypond include path" in the Preferences
> > > > dialog, but Frescobaldi does not find it.
> > >
> > > This should do what you want, so if it doesn't work, please file a 
> > > bug report.
> >
> > Will do.
> >
> > > Note that you should specify the path to the directory containing that
> > > file, not to the file itself.
> >
> > Yes I did...in fact the dialog will only allow you to choose a 
> > directory and not a filename.
>
> Does it make any difference if you use Publication, Custom or Preview 
> Mode?
>
> Urs

Hm, looking at the code (Preview Mode additions) I had a certain idea:
When compiling in preview mode, the include path isn't extended by the 
path to the preview mode files, but instead there is another '-I' option 
appended to the command line.

So in Preview Mode Frescobaldi will now use (excerpt)

lilypond ... -I PATHS-FROM-PREFERENCES ... -I PATH-TO-DEBUG-MODE-FILES

However, when I tested right now everything works as expected.

So a question to the others:
Is it possible that the second -I command line option shadows the first 
on Windows while it doesn't on Linux?
Phil: Could you test this with plain command line LilyPond please?

Urs