[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Survey: Large scores
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Survey: Large scores |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:54:44 -0400 |
Hi Orm,
> the biggest score so far for me is a piece for big orchestra, 6
> soloists, live-electronics and fixed media from last year.
This sounds great!
Would love to see it, but the link didn’t work for me… =\
> considering the amount of source files
Curious! For my 57-part orchestra piece, I only used one source file for the
notes, and one each for the score and part(s). How do you break up all your
files (beyond, I’m assuming, a notes-source file for each instrument), and what
do you see as the big benefit(s) of having so many source files?
> The only really painful part was the partcombiner
This is a big one for me. I would love to see — and would be happy to help fund
— a GUPPY (Grand Unified Partcombiner Project, Yay!) to tackle a rewrite from
the ground up, taking into account all the recent advances in divisi writing
(still only in openlilylib, I believe), etc.
Cheers,
Kieren.
_______________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
www: <http://www.kierenmacmillan.info>
email: address@hidden
- Re: Survey: Large scores, (continued)
- Re: Survey: Large scores,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Survey: Large scores, H. S. Teoh, 2015/04/18
- Re: Survey: Large scores, Orm Finnendahl, 2015/04/19
- Something wrong with transposing instruments? (Was: Re: Survey: Large scores), Gilles, 2015/04/19
- Re: Something wrong with transposing instruments? (Was: Re: Survey: Large scores), Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/19
- Re: Something wrong with transposing instruments?, Gilles, 2015/04/19
- Re: Survey: Large scores, H. S. Teoh, 2015/04/19
- Re: Survey: Large scores, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/20
- Re: Survey: Large scores, H. S. Teoh, 2015/04/20
- Re: Survey: Large scores, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/20
- Re: Survey: Large scores, Orm Finnendahl, 2015/04/20