[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beamed Tremolo + Fermata
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Beamed Tremolo + Fermata |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:27:52 +0100 |
2015-12-29 14:10 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden>:
> Hi Harm,
>
> On Dec 28, 2015, at 5:47 PM, Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Though, we don't do all nicely with tremolo. Look at the terrible output
>> from:
>> \repeat tremolo 16 { c''32 ais' }
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3143/
>
> UGH.
>
> Well, there’s always tweaking:
>
> {
> \once \override Beam.gap = #2.5
> \once \override Beam.extra-offset = #'(-0.75 . 0)
> \once \override TupletNumber.extra-offset = #'(-0.75 . 0)
> \tupletUp \fermataOverTremolo \repeat tremolo 16 { c''32 \once \override
> NoteColumn.X-offset = #4 ais’ }
> }
Sure. Although LilyPond should do the right thing per default, as you
use to say ;)
> All of that can be done post-hoc (using the edition-engraver), so it’s not
> quite as horrible as it may seem at first.
> But it would be nice if that bug were fixed…
Indeed. Beyond my depth, though. I think some C++-work has to be done.
Cheers,
Harm