lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: use of set Timing.measurePosition is disrupting automatic beaming


From: Roderick Mackenzie
Subject: Re: use of set Timing.measurePosition is disrupting automatic beaming
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:17:56 +0200

Hallo,

many thanks for the suggestions.

I am using an older version because it happens to be in the Ubuntu LTS
repositories and I have not got round to upgrading yet.

Elaine, I use repeat barlines at the start of each part because
bagpipe tunes always have them at the start and end of each part, and
repeat volta only places them at the end.

David, you are quite correct: the partial measures at the end and
start of a part always add up to a full measure. The code you included
compiles correctly under my older version of Lilypond so that is very
hopeful. I will see what happens when I write out a complete tune like
that.

Best wishes,
Roddy



On 13/09/2016, Flaming Hakama by Elaine <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Hallo,
>> >
>> > I am learning how to write bagpipe tunes with Lilypond. Bagpipe tunes
>> > are usually in parts with a partial measure at the start and end of
>> > each part. In order to avoid the warnings about use of "\partial"
>> > within the body of the score I am trying to use "\set
>> > Timing.measurePosition = #(ly:make-moment -3/8)".
>>
>> As of version 2.19.12, \partial is allowed in mid-measure.
>>
>> > My problem is that this command seems to disrupt the automatic
>> > beaming: the half measure before the command is always printed as
>> > individual notes. In the attached fragment the first one and a half
>> > measures are correctly beamed but then the last half bar has no
>> > beaming. What am I doing wrong?
>>
>> An upgrade to a current developer version might be worth considering
>> (though I think the last few versions had various problems).  I'm not
>> sure this will help with the autobeam problem, but once you are using a
>> version similar to that of the developers, the chances for them being
>> able to offer good advice and/or reproduce problems are better.
>>
>> --
>> David Kastrup
>>
>
>
> I have never upgraded past 2.19.15 because on mac they get like molasses
> after that point.
>
> In any case, when I try an essential version of your code, I don't need to
> fiddle with Timing.measurePosition.  And there are no beaming problems that
> I can see.
>
> If you put the repeat within a \repeat command, you don't need to specify
> the repeat barlines.
> Since your barline specification indicated you wanted a second repeated
> section, I added a second repeat and some more notes to demonstrate that.
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> {
>     \time 2/4
>
>     \repeat volta 2 {
>         \partial 8 e8
>         a16. a32 a16. b32     b32 a16. b32 d16.
>         e16. a32 a32 a16.          b16. e32 e32 g16.
>         a4                                   a8
>     }
>
>     \repeat volta 2 {
>         g8 2 4.
>     }
> }
>
>
> HTH,
>
> David Elaine Alt
> 415 . 341 .4954                                           "*Confusion is
> highly underrated*"
> address@hidden
> self-immolation.info
> skype: flaming_hakama
> Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]