lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Augmentation dot positioning


From: Chris Yate
Subject: Re: Augmentation dot positioning
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:01:18 +0000

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 at 14:36 Chris Yate <address@hidden> wrote:

> According to Gould, I believe that dots limit 3 is the correct setting.


OK. On reflection, perhaps I can see your reasoning, although I disagree that the current situation reliably produces the notation one would expect. And it's insufficiently controllable.

In any case, I might argue "chord-dots-limit" isn't unambiguously explained

". Limits the column of dots on each chord to the height of the chord plus chord-dots-limit staff-positions."

In situation 1 in my test cases, the height of the chord is 4 staff-positions... or is it 2 and a half staff-spaces? 

Should I want in example 2, to have dots on the D, F, A spaces and not on B, then chord-dots-limit=1 might be interpreted to suppress the dot that's 2 staff positions away from the chord (on B space) and place one 1 staff position _above_ the chord, on A.  The dotsUp and dotsDown settings don't appear to have any effect here.

Chris

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]