[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox
From: |
David Sumbler |
Subject: |
Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:00:04 +0100 |
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 13:59 +0100, David Sumbler wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:34 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> > David Sumbler <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system, I have Guile 1.8 installed
> > > complete with readline, I'd be very grateful if somebody could
> > > explain
> > > to me how I can get readline to load when I type 'lilypond
> > > scheme-
> > > sandbox' with Lilypond v.2.19.40 .
> > Did you compile LilyPond yourself?
> (There is an error in my previous email: I have Lilypond v.2.19.48)
>
> I downloaded lilypond-2.19.48-1.linux-64.sh from http://lilypond.org/
> de
> velopment.html and then ran
>
> sudo sh ./lilypond-2.19.48-1.linux-64.sh --doc
>
> David
Sorry to keep banging on about this, but I can't help feeling that
somebody must know the answer!
My .guile file reads:
(use-modules (ice-9 readline))
(activate-readline)
I find the following:
1)
If I run 'lilypond scheme-sandbox' I get a message saying:
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/scheme-
sandbox.ly:3:2: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression
beginning here
#
(load-user-init)
readline is not provided in this Guile installation
In 'top' I can see that the actual running command is
'/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond scheme-sandbox'.
2)
If I run '/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond scheme-sandbox' directly
from the command line, I get guile complete with readline.
This doesn't actually matter too much now that I have discovered that
the longer form of the command works as expected, even though the
shorter one doesn't.
But how is it that I get different results from two command line
entries which end up running the same actual command?
David
- No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/16
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/16
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/16
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/16
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/16
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/17
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/19
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/19
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/19
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox,
David Sumbler <=
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Mark Knoop, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21