[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2016 21:43:35 +0200 |
2016-10-21 19:34 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler <address@hidden>:
> On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 18:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> For the record, I get
>>
>> p guile-1.8-
>> libs
>> - Core Guile
>> libraries
>>
>> i guile-1.8-
>> libs:amd64
>> - Core Guile
>> libraries
>>
>>
>> with the above aptitude command
A strange observation:
I compiled a .ly-file containing nothing but
\version "2.19.44"
#(use-modules (ice-9 readline))
With lily compiled from git I get:
GNU LilyPond 2.19.50
Processing `atest-42.ly'
Parsing...
Success: compilation successfully completed
But with 2.19.44 from the released installer:
GNU LilyPond 2.19.44
Processing `atest-42.ly'
Parsing...
atest-42.ly:3:2: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression
beginning here
#
(use-modules (ice-9 readline))
readline is not provided in this Guile installation
fatal error: failed files: "atest-42.ly"
wtf ???
For the record, I'm on Ubuntu 16.04, 64-bit, lilypond-git and
lilypond-2.19.44 are both in my home-directory
aptitude search guile-1.8-libs
returns:
i A guile-1.8-libs
- Core Guile libraries
p guile-1.8-libs:i386
- Core Guile libraries
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, (continued)
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/17
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/19
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/19
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/19
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Mark Knoop, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/22