[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Notational conventions
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: Notational conventions |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:30:56 +0100 |
> On 9 Nov 2016, at 13:37, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> On 9 Nov 2016, at 10:45, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> The problem with appoggiature is that their timing is loose as the
>>> transition to the main note is not supposed to be a rhythmical accent.
>>> If you listen to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQseNJP_bzk in
>>> comparison to most renditions, you'll find that I execute the
>>> appoggiature on the long side, passing the "proper" moment (and yes,
>>> I know that I have only executed the explicitly written ones in the
>>> manuscript with "violine concertante" as I was too lazy to figure out a
>>> strategy myself when the top voice is almost but not quite a solo voice
>>> in a string quartet).
>>
>> You need an expert: one of my teachers could do Baroque improvisations.
>>
>> The long grace notes, I usually prefer toward the half written value,
>> though some perform the full value.
>
> An appoggiatura does not feel like a "grace note" to me. Vaccai states
> in his singing exercises that the appoggiatura should be _at least_ the
> written value. The point being that the _main_ note pitch is
> uninteresting and is what the note relaxes rather than resolves to.
The execution varied considerably, according to Harvard Concise, giving an
example of a 1/8 in small print connected to a 1/2-note: The French might
execute it before the main note, otherwise as half the written value, the
value, or longer, plus some.
> Of course masking this change by executing it simultaneously with
> _significant_ changes in other voices is a perfectly valid kind of
> execution. But it becomes almost impossible to do this with an
> articulation that differentiates the appoggiatura from a regular note:
> when transcribing music played in that manner, no appoggiatura would
> ever appear.
>
> Which is vaguely disturbing to me. So I might be overdoing my "musical
> pronunciation" as a sign of me being unable to convey very subtle
> differences in a sovereign manner.
I prefer no overlap in the ornaments, that is, legato style. Even in Balkan
music, overlap does not seem necessary.
- Re: How to get irrational tuplets inside a regular meter like 9/8, (continued)
- Re: How to get irrational tuplets inside a regular meter like 9/8, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/08
- [Why you don't really want] irrational tuplets [nor CF approximations], Alexander Kobel, 2016/11/08
- Re: [Why you don't really want] irrational tuplets [nor CF approximations], Hans Åberg, 2016/11/08
- Re: [Why you don't really want] irrational tuplets [nor CF approximations], Thomas Morley, 2016/11/08
- Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/08
- Re: Notational conventions, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/08
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09