[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Permission for music
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: Permission for music |
Date: |
Wed, 24 May 2017 20:40:23 -0700 |
So we should burn the books because the ignorant refuse to learn?
-----Original Message-----
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:43 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Permission for music
On Wed, 24 May 2017, David Wright wrote:
> Perhaps this is because educators are pandering to their ignorance,
> thus decreasing the likelihood they'll ever encounter the term.
> I'm glad that LilyPond's authors know precisely what it does so well.
Removing the advertisement is much easier than educating everyone who will
ever look at a piece of sheet music about what the word "engrave" means.
--
Matthew Skala
address@hidden People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: Permission for music, (continued)
- Re: Permission for music, mskala, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, Simon Albrecht, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, mskala, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, Karlin High, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, David Wright, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, mskala, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, David Wright, 2017/05/24
- RE: Permission for music,
Mark Stephen Mrotek <=
- Re: Permission for music, David Kastrup, 2017/05/25