RE: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations

[Kieran Mansley]

On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 08:29 -0500, Bill Auerbach wrote:
> Does this mean you do not want tasks and patches submitted for performance
> enhancements?  From the posts on lwip-users, performance may be more
> important for some users than you are willing to agree with or admit to. The
> point is, if those of us who are trying to improve performance are wasting
> our time contributing and making suggestions it would be really good to know
> that.

No, you're not wasting your time.  I do want tasks and patches submitted
for performance enhancements.  But any changes that make lwIP less
portable etc. need some justification, and as performance is not one of
the goals of the project (but being portable and lightweight are) it is
unlikely to take precedence.

Kieran