[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW]
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW] |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:49:48 +0200 |
> Maybe we can collaborate - I did a crude "git er done" GET and POST
> handler
> practically hard coded for a demo. I want GET and POST to be able to
> reference (easily if possible) C variables - updating on a POST and
> returning on a GET.
I thought of something like that, also. The problem is memory usage (or tcp raw
API limitations?): currently, the httpd returns static memory (i.e. tcp doesn't
need to copy). With variables in it, tcp would have to copy, but we'd need to
create the page before that. This would mean we need the memory twice (1.
create the char[] containing the file and 2. tcp copies it into pbufs).
To prevent that, we'd have to move from such a char[] to a callback that
generates the bytes we need before passing them to tcp_write (is that what
Luminary did?), but that's quite hard.
Therefore, we could allocate the memory using mem_malloc (maybe in blocks?),
let tcp_write not copy it and then free the memory when tcp_sent tells us the
data has been sent...
> I was trying to get Luminary's httpd port running and
> had trouble. It has some interesting and worthwhile concepts. One is a
> callback to the app as it needs data to fill in. I was headed toward a
> fixed table of data which contains fields for the type and how to format
> the
> output. I was thinking of using e.g. the printf/scanf specifiers and use
> them to format incoming and outgoing data. There are a lot of ways to do
> this of course.
I like the idea. I'm currently in the process of restructuring the code of
httpd.c in contrib, but I want to wait until after the release before
committing it.
Simon
--
Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate
für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], address@hidden, 2009/08/10
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Chris Strahm, 2009/08/11
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/11
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], address@hidden, 2009/08/11
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/11
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], address@hidden, 2009/08/11
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/11
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Chris Strahm, 2009/08/11
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], address@hidden, 2009/08/11
- RE: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Bill Auerbach, 2009/08/12
- RE: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW],
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- RE: [lwip-users] Improved HTTP webserver (was: http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW]), Bill Auerbach, 2009/08/12
- RE: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Pettinato, Jim, 2009/08/12
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Jeff Barber, 2009/08/10
- Re: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/11
- RE: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Ben Hastings, 2009/08/10
- RE: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/11
Fw: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW], Chris Strahm, 2009/08/11