Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: rfc on h: selector behavior

[Daniel Carosone]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:06:35AM -0700, Emile Snyder wrote:
> > Scenario III:
> > .............
> > I have a working copy and have commited local changes, which
> > are commited:
> > 
> > 
> >     Ancestor      -------> Newly received head
> >           \
> >            \---> Working copy
> > 
> > I would like to be able to do something like, [fantasy syntax follows]
> > 
> >    monotone diff --revision=lca:(h:|i:$(cat MT/revision)) --revision=h:
> > 
> > for the differences between ancestor and newly received head.
> 
> Hmmm.  I can see the desire for such a thing here too, but appropriate
> syntax totally fails me ;)

This is almost exactly the "what damage am I about to do with an
'update'?" query/scenario I spoke about recently.  I'd really like
some way to express this, too.

--
Dan.

pgpuRku0YMmCE.pgp
Description: PGP signature