monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Translations revisited


From: Patrick Georgi
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Translations revisited
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:23:43 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061204)

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker schrieb:
I'm looking at the translations done until now, and this is what I get:
I'm currently looking at what functionality the Makefile in po/ has to provide for devs (besides .po -> .gmo/.mo parsing), because I intend to remove the dependency on gnu gettext there.

Currently, the Makefile in po/ is created by autopoint, a component of gettext. I already rewrote the autoconf tests (as they're also provided by gnu gettext - see nvm.portable-gettext-support), but they still need some work, and now making that Makefile.in static is my next step.

so, what's necessary?
- .po -> .gmo/.mo compilation, with using LINGUAS and Makevars as appropriate - autoconf tests to figure out which tools to use and which features they provide (eg. most of Makevars is utterly useless with solaris' gettext variant)
- xgettext runs to extract new versions of .po (into .pot, it seems)
- run of msgmerge where available to merge .po and .pot into a new version

anything else? or is any of these not actually in use?

Also, if the Makefile.in.in in po/ exists, the branch mentioned above should compile just fine - at least the configure step runs through and creates all variables (with the single known issue, that ENABLE_NLS isn't disabled if HAVE_GETTEXT and the like are disabled because the libraries can't be found) However there was no testing on non-solaris platforms yet, reports if there are any differences on other platforms are more than welcome!


Regards,
Patrick Georgi




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]