[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo
From: |
Chris Allegretta |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:23:59 -0500 |
Hmm, I thought we'd settled on doing it at the 2.6.0 release. I'm
curious what the rationale to switch now would be?
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Benno Schulenberg
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 17:31, Chris Allegretta wrote:
>> I am fine with a conversion to git, I just was never as successful as
>> everyone else at getting the repo converted. If someone else is
>> willing to do this work I'm happy for us to switch to it.
>
> Would now be a good time to switch to using git?
>
> Benno
>
> --
> http://www.fastmail.com - Does exactly what it says on the tin
>
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo,
Chris Allegretta <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Jordi Mallach, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/03/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Jordi Mallach, 2016/03/30