[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3 |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:02:23 -0500 |
>Be sure to also do step 2 from README.developers process (a ChangeLog entry
>to mark the release of the version in question).
Good point; thanks for the pointer.
>Hmm. Okay, I see, /usr/include/sasl.h is the 1.5 version of the header, and
>/usr/include/sasl/sasl.h is the 2.1 version. I presume this happens if you
>install Cyrus 2.1 with some kind of 1.x compatibility turned on or
>something?
No, definately not. There's no compatibility for the old SASL API.
Is there a /usr/lib/libsasl.* ? This sounds like a RedHat-ism.
>Does 2.1 always install sasl.h in a "sasl" subdirectory? If so,
>you could change it from #include <sasl.h> to #include <sasl/sasl.h> to get
>around the problem.
No, traditionally (installing it from the SASL distribution) it gets
installed in $(prefix)/include. Sigh, another RedHat difference.
>Otherwise, some autoconf support will be necessary.
Since you can specify CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/include/sasl, I don't think it's
critical right now. I'd really rather push 1.1 out the door at this
stage, since it's been so delayed.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Scott Blachowicz, 2004/02/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Scott Blachowicz, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Dan Harkless, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Dan Harkless, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Neil W Rickert, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Dan Harkless, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Glenn Burkhardt, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Dan Harkless, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3, Dan Harkless, 2004/02/27