Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3

[Dan Harkless]

On February 26, 2004, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
> >Hmm.  Okay, I see, /usr/include/sasl.h is the 1.5 version of the header, and
> >/usr/include/sasl/sasl.h is the 2.1 version.  I presume this happens if you
> >install Cyrus 2.1 with some kind of 1.x compatibility turned on or
> >something?
> 
> No, definately not.  There's no compatibility for the old SASL API.
> Is there a /usr/lib/libsasl.* ?  This sounds like a RedHat-ism.

www-dan> ls -oF /usr/lib/libsasl*
-rw-r--r--    1 root        62474 Jan 25  2003 /usr/lib/libsasl.a
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root          770 Jan 25  2003 /usr/lib/libsasl.la*
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root           17 Feb 23 09:44 /usr/lib/libsasl.so -> 
libsasl.so.7.1.11*
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root           17 Feb 23 03:39 /usr/lib/libsasl.so.7 -> 
libsasl.so.7.1.11*
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root        43612 Jan 25  2003 /usr/lib/libsasl.so.7.1.11*
-rw-r--r--    1 root       259634 Jan 25  2003 /usr/lib/libsasl2.a
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root          768 Jan 25  2003 /usr/lib/libsasl2.la*
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root           18 Feb 23 09:44 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so -> 
libsasl2.so.2.0.10*
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root           18 Feb 23 03:39 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 -> 
libsasl2.so.2.0.10*
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root        76612 Jan 25  2003 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.10*

> >Otherwise, some autoconf support will be necessary.
> 
> Since you can specify CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/include/sasl, I don't think it's
> critical right now.  I'd really rather push 1.1 out the door at this
> stage, since it's been so delayed.

As I mentioned, I set that and it had no effect.  There appears to be a bug
in the nmh makefiles with propagating the CPPFLAGS setting.  I believe I saw
it get passed down to make as it recursed into directories, but the setting
didn't get used on the compile commandline.

I can go in and manually compile the files that bomb, adding
-I/usr/include/sasl, but I don't think most would be so patient, and Red Hat
isn't exactly an uncommon OS...

--
Dan Harkless
http://harkless.org/dan/