Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3

[Neil W Rickert]

Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote on Feb 26, 2004:

>>Does 2.1 always install sasl.h in a "sasl" subdirectory?  If so,
>>you could change it from #include <sasl.h> to #include <sasl/sasl.h> to get
>>around the problem.

>No, traditionally (installing it from the SASL distribution) it gets
>installed in $(prefix)/include.  Sigh, another RedHat difference.

Strange.

On my system, the headers were all installed in $(prefix)/include/sasl
The headers for 1.5 were installed in $(prefix)/include

>>Otherwise, some autoconf support will be necessary.

>Since you can specify CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/include/sasl, I don't think it's

That's probably a mistake.  The "#include" statements should be
specify "<sasl/sasl.h>".  It is usually bad practice to list a
subdirectory of "/usr/include" in a "-I" directive.

 -NWR