[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies
|
From: |
paul vixie |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies |
|
Date: |
Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:25:40 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 |
On 12/4/2012 8:22 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
>> What's wrong with QP? Are you advocating for Base64? If so, why?
> Well, since you're asking ... I'm advocating 8bit. Or really, make the
> encoding user-selectable.
default should be 8bit. MH could be the one MUA in the universe that
doesn't gratuitously encode in QP.
--
"I suspect I'm not known as a font of optimism." (VJS, 2012)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Oliver Kiddle, 2012/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/06
- [Nmh-workers] MIME user interface (was: Re: 78 column limit), Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/04
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/04
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05