[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:32:07 -0500 |
>It is an exercise in futility to deal with MUAs that do not following
>the specifications. Text/plain should be rendered in fixed-width font
>and line breaks should be honored. Inferring "paragraphs" and
>reformatting should not be done.
While I agree that in text/plain line breaks should be honored, I'm not
aware of any requirement that says it should be rendered in a fixed-width
font. I don't necessarily disagree with that requirement (but plenty of
people would) but sadly THAT battle is lost.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Earl Hood, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Oliver Kiddle, 2012/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/06
- [Nmh-workers] MIME user interface (was: Re: 78 column limit), Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit,
Ken Hornstein <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/04
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/04
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05