[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?
From: |
chad |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:32:49 -0800 |
On 14 Jan 2013, at 14:05, Paul Fox <address@hidden> wrote:
> ken wrote:
>>
>> Ok, this means I get to ask a question of greybeards that I've always
>> wondered about.
>>
>> What is the deal with VISUAL and EDITOR? I always set EDITOR; I've never
>> set VISUAL. I've never understood what the difference is. I'm fine with
>> making the hierarchy Editor: -> $VISUAL -> $EDITOR (and I think a default
>> of 'vi' is fine), but I've always wondered why there are two environment
>> variables.
>
> not all terminals were capable of doing the cursor addressing needed
> for any given screen-oriented editor. so the user was given the ability
> to configure two editors -- likely "ed" and "vi", though some folks may
> have used emacs or "se" :-). some programs had separate commands for
> invoking the two. (for instance, see ~e and ~v in the mailx man page.)
I used one of these regularly, with mh, on a Palm V with an early
cellular modem, around 1998-2000 or so. I really doubt there are
people doing this any more.
As a matter of practical old-fogey-ness, I wonder if people regularly
use nmh on systems where vi isn't vim.
~Chad
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Vixie, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Fox, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Tethys, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Fox, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?,
chad <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Fox, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Vixie, 2013/01/14