[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again
|
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 22:18:26 -0700 |
On Oct 24, 2013, at 10:13 PM, chad <address@hidden> wrote:
> Beyond that, email messages are generally large (compared to calendar
> entries, anyway) collections of text. Changes to messages mostly involve
> small deltas to metadata. Managing changes to changes to changes based on
> revisions and times isn’t trivial, but a lot of the automation (conceptually)
> has already been written.
I would really like to see evidence of this claim. My experience of
manipulating email messages says otherwise.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Joel Uckelman, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Earl Hood, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Alexander Zangerl, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/28