[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again
From: |
Valdis . Kletnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:35:32 -0400 |
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:11:12 -0400, Ken Hornstein said:
> >Beyond that, email messages are generally large (compared to calendar
> >entries, anyway) collections of text. Changes to messages mostly involve
> >small deltas to metadata.
>
> Note that messages in IMAP are immutable; we don't have to worry about
> changes to a message.
Hmm.. so 'anno' is a complete loss then? I'd be screwed if I didn't have
a way to add 'Replied:' headers....
pgp_62tszjQCv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again,
Valdis . Kletnieks <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Alexander Zangerl, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Joel Uckelman, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Todd M. Kover, 2013/10/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Jerrad Pierce, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/24