[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:11:12 -0400 |
>Hashing of the message contents really helps make git not rely as much
>on the semantics of file names, and this is where I thought that git's
>approach might be most interesting.
Right, but think about this: with nmh, the semantics of the filenames
IS the important part.
>Beyond that, email messages are generally large (compared to calendar
>entries, anyway) collections of text. Changes to messages mostly involve
>small deltas to metadata.
Note that messages in IMAP are immutable; we don't have to worry about
changes to a message.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Earl Hood, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Alexander Zangerl, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Joel Uckelman, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25