[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:33:02 -0400 |
> > There used to be some leakage; for example, the old attach
> > implementation would parse the Nmh-Attachment headers and then create
> > mhbuild directives. I am not sure there is any leakage now. But
> > I am not in love with the idea of changing the leading character,
> > because that opens the box for "how should we do MIME composition,
> > anyway?" Which is not going to be easy. As a
>
>i guess i'm not sure how letting a user change the prefix character on
>the existing mechanism would make that worse.
I understand your point ... it's just that it seems like a Band-Aidâ„¢ on
a much larger problem, and I'd rather solve the much larger problem. But
then again, I wrote replyfilter which is also a Band-Aidâ„¢ on a much
larger problem. I don't have a good answer, unfortunately; the idea
of changing that leaves me unsettled, but I recognize that's not really
a rational argument. What do others think?
--Ken
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/04/14