[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?
|
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:19:49 +0000 |
Hi Ken,
> Alright, so, question time ... do we want to fix the broken test for
> 1.7.1?
I have a fix. Will push to master soon.
> We've already decided, I believe, that iconv will be manitory going
> forward;
Don't think David commented?
> the only problem (AFAIK) is that the tests for when we don't have
> iconv are broken.
Just the one. The fix is to simplify.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., P Vix, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Todd C. Miller, 2018/02/01
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/02/01
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03