Re: Beyond 2.9.5

[Paul Kienzle]

On Apr 13, 2006, at 5:24 PM, David Bateman wrote:

> > OK I may do this for the future.
> >
> > But for this patch, could you (or someone else) please apply it and
> > check it in if you agree with the method I used?
>
>
> Ok, done but the mfilename changes you made were already in and so it
> didn't patch cleanly... Frankly, the only thing I see that might be 
> done
> different is if we go straight to the final solution removing
> OV_REP_TYPE, and assuming that the CVS HEAD will never again be used 
> for
> anything except a 2.9.5+ version (which is pretty much where we are now
> in any case)... Though the cruft for this is minor.

CVS head is 2.9.5+.  There is a branch for 2.1.x.  Lots of minor
cruft becomes major cruft, so avoid what we can.

        - Paul