[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0.1 release?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0.1 release? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:09:51 +0200 |
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:02 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> The second test release is here:
>
> http://jbrwww.che.wisc.edu/home/jwe/octave-3.0.1b.tar.bz2
>
> I think I've fixed all of the problems reported specifically about the
> 3.0.1a test release. Since this release should fix bugs and not
> introduce them, I'd like to have some people try it before releasing
> and announcing it.
The package compiles and runs fine under Win32/MSVC. The test suite
reports the same problem as before: see for instance
http://www.nabble.com/fntests-errors-on-mingw-Octave-1%3Adispatch.cc-to14574608.html#a14582630
Among "known" failures, the 2 most problematic ones are:
========================
***** assert(bitcmp(A,Amax),bitor(bitshift(1,Amax-1),bitshift(1,Amax-2)));
!!!!! test failed
error: assert (bitcmp (A, Amax),bitor (bitshift (1, Amax - 1),
bitshift (1, Amax - 2))) expected
6.7554e+015
but got
1.1259e+016
values do not match
shared variables {
Amax = 53
Bmax = 9.0072e+015
A = 2.2518e+015
}
========================
***** test
charset = setstr (0:127);
result = zeros (1, 128);
result (33:127) = 1;
assert(all (isprint (charset) == result));
!!!!! test failed
error: assert (all (isprint (charset) == result)) failed
========================
For the first one, I have no clue. The second one is due to the
fact that under Win32: isprint(setstr(9)) returns 1, while the
test expects 0.
Michael.
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, (continued)
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (report on mingw), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (report on mingw), Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (report on mingw), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (cygwin), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- RE: 3.0.1 release?, Bateman David-ADB014, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/08