[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:14:29 -0400 |
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:02 PM, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Michael Godfrey wrote:
>>> I looked quickly at this patch. It seems to have many changes
>>> whose effect is nothing. i.e. a line is replaced by an identical
>>> line. Is it possible that there was an error in building the
>>> patch? Some changes were also introduced, but it is hard to
>>> isolate them from the "do nothing" changes. In any case, it would
>>> seem good to back it out until the problem can be isolated and a
>>> patch which only makes changes can be generated.
>
> On 15 September 2011 19:59, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I agree. There are a lot of changes that appear to be "do nothing".
>> Does anyone know why "hg diff" is detecting a change where there
>> appears to be none?
>
> It's whitespace. Do "hg diff -w" to omit whitespace changes.
>
> - Jordi G. H.
Thanks Jordi.
The part that is left is short enough that is should be possible to isolate the
problem.
The announcement for Version 1.3.6 is below ...
http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gl2ps-announce/2011/000019.html
The pixel zoom for ps images looks like a good place to start.
Ben
gl2ps.diff
Description: Binary data