octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:54:12 -0400

On Sep 16, 2011, at 4:20 AM, Michael Goffioul wrote:

> 2011/9/16 Ben Abbott <address@hidden>:
>> 
>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:02 PM, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Michael Godfrey wrote:
>>>>> I looked quickly at this patch.  It seems to have many changes
>>>>> whose effect is nothing. i.e. a line is replaced by an identical
>>>>> line.   Is it possible that there was an error in building the
>>>>> patch?  Some changes were also introduced, but it is hard to
>>>>> isolate them from the "do nothing" changes.  In any case, it would
>>>>> seem good to back it out until the problem can be isolated and a
>>>>> patch which only makes changes can be generated.
>>> 
>>> On 15 September 2011 19:59, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> I agree. There are a lot of changes that appear to be "do nothing".
>>>> Does anyone know why "hg diff" is detecting a change where there
>>>> appears to be none?
>>> 
>>> It's whitespace. Do "hg diff -w" to omit whitespace changes.
>>> 
>>> - Jordi G. H.
>> 
>> Thanks Jordi.
>> 
>> The part that is left is short enough that is should be possible to isolate 
>> the problem.
>> 
>> The announcement for Version 1.3.6 is below ...
>> 
>>        http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gl2ps-announce/2011/000019.html
>> 
>> The pixel zoom for ps images looks like a good place to start.
>> 
>> Ben
> 
> Ben,
> 
> There's something weird when I parse the logs for the file gl2ps.c
> from the hgweb
> interface. The change http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/7dedfd70dd9f
> seems to add support for pixelzoom (claiming to pull changes from
> gl2ps-1.3.5-svn),
> but then the change http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/7b4ec6f841a2
> seems to revert everything (claiming to sync with gl2ps-1.3.5).
> 
> Moreover, the announcement
> http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gl2ps-announce/2011/000019.html
> indicates that the current gl2ps version is 1.3.6 (not 1.3.5). Is it
> possible that you
> accidentally removed support for pixelzoom, by syncing with the wrong
> gl2ps version?
> 
> Michael.

Unfortunately, that sort of thing is all too common with me :-(

I'll backout the last gl2ps update and take a closer look this weekend.

Ben





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]