Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m

[bpabbott]

I composed a simple test script to compare Matlab and Octave

clf ()
subplot (3,1,1)
plot (rand (3))
title ({'one', 'two', 'three'})
xlabel xlabel
subplot (3,1,2)
plot (rand (3))
xlabel xlabel
subplot (3,1,3)
xlabel xlabel
plot (rand (3))
xlabel xlabel

The results for Octave and Matlab are at the links below.

<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655822/FLTK.png> 

<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655822/Matlab.png> 

The results are consistent, but are also more esthetic than your example. 
Can you provide a short script which I can run through Matlab to see how it
behaves?

In any event, I do think the margins between the subplots are too generous
and can be reduced.



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/changes-to-graphics-cc-and-subplot-m-tp4655812p4655822.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.