|
From: | marco Vassallo |
Subject: | RE: project progress |
Date: | Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:28:11 +0200 |
> Subject: Re: project progress > From: address@hidden > Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 12:11:08 +0200 > To: address@hidden > CC: address@hidden > > > On 2 Sep 2013, at 09:20, c. <address@hidden> wrote: > > > > > On 2 Sep 2013, at 08:53, marco Vassallo <address@hidden> wrote: > > > >> http://gedeone-gsoc.blogspot.it/2013/09/update-14.html > > > > Looks very nice, thanks! > > > > Though, as I wrote, it would be great to have a line-by-line comparison > > of the implementation in Python and Octave. > > > > If not for this one example, at least for other simpler examples. > > > > c. > > Marco, > > Could you please start wotking on the tasks I mentioned above, i.e.: > Hi, as we have discussed yesterday, I have changed the name to some functions and added the Constant function. > - fem-fenics package release On the mercurial repository is available an almost finished version of the pkg https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/fem-fenics/ci/default/tree/fem-fenics.tar.gz?format=raw > - side by side comparison of Octave and Python examples I've start writing some example in the wiki http://wiki.octave.org/Fem-fenics Thanks Marco |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |