Re: very small packages - merge into general/miscelleneous or move into core

[c.]

On 14 Jan 2014, at 16:20, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:

> There's a lot of things on those emails and breaking it apart to do a
> point by point reply is too confusing so I'll just write a single long
> reply.

I agree that the discussion has become too convoulted so let's split it 
up and deal with one issue at a time.

> Functions are grouped in packages based on a common subject.

The main question is grouped by whom?

Do you feel that you as the main maintainer of the OctaveForge website
are responsible of moving functions around and maintaining all the packages?

c.