Re: very small packages - merge into general/miscelleneous or move into core

[Carnë Draug]

On 15 January 2014 10:22, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 14 Jan 2014, at 18:20, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 14 January 2014 16:12, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 16:20, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Functions are grouped in packages based on a common subject.
>>>
>>> The main question is grouped by whom?
>>
>> By whoever is maintaining the package.
>>
>>> Do you feel that you as the main maintainer of the OctaveForge website
>>> are responsible of moving functions around and maintaining all the packages?
>>
>> No. But the packages that I am the maintainer (image) and the ones who
>> lack a maintainer yes.
>>
>> Carnë
>
> OK, I'm very glad we agree 100% on this part.
>
> So if a package is useful and maintained, do
> you think we should care about how many functions
> it contains?

No.